Conservation

Average protection of Key Biodiversity Areas

Manager — Tue, 31 May 2022 13:44:17 +0000

Average protection of Key Biodiversity Areas

Manager Tue, 05/31/2022 - 09:44

In which countries are the sites that most contribute to global biodiversity persistence located and how well are these sites covered by protected areas in each country?

Safeguarding the Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) is vital for halting the decline in biodiversity and for ensuring the long-term and sustainable use of terrestrial and marine natural resources. The establishment of protected areas in the locations where these KBAs are found is one of the priority actions to safeguard their conservation values. The KBA-related indicators contribute to measuring progress towards Aichi Target 11 of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), and are also part of the suite of indicators adopted to assess progress towards Sustainable Development Goal 15 (life on land).

Indicator unit: Average protection percentage of KBAs.

Area of interest: The indicator is available at the country level.

---

Data Uploaded by Luca Battistella using the Digital Observatory for Protected Areas Services (2022)

Response (Policies and Goals/Targets)

Goal 15. Protect terrestrial ecosystems

Goal 14. Protect marine ecosystems

Target 11 on Protected Areas

Target 12 on threatened species

Technical Reference/Fact Sheet

DOPA Factsheet

Source

Source:

Ranking

off

Make Map Points

Off

State

biology

Global Data

Average protection of Key Biodiversity Areas

The Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) are sites that contribute significantly to the global persistence of biodiversity in terrestrial, freshwater and marine environments. KBAs are identified according to a set of criteria and thresholds related to taxonomic, ecological and thematic subsets of biodiversity (presence of threatened species or ecosystems, geographically restricted species, ecological integrity, etc.). The identification of a site as a KBA on the basis of these criteria and thresholds is unrelated to its legal or protection status.

https://rest-services.jrc.ec.europa.eu/services/d6dopa/dopa_42/get_dopa_country_all_inds?format=json

iso3

{"name":"Country ", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"country_name"}

{"name":"Average protection of Key Biodiversity Areas", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"", "data":"kba_avg_prot_perc_tot"}

{"name":"Average protection of Key Biodiversity Areas", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Average protection of Key Biodiversity Areas", "data":"kba_avg_prot_perc_tot"}

Descending

REST

Natural Breaks (Jenks)

diverging-1

National Data

Key Biodiversity Areas average protection

https://rest-services.jrc.ec.europa.eu/services/d6dopa/dopa_42/get_dopa_country_all_inds?format=json&country_code=NUM

Key Biodiversity Areas Centroids

{ "id": "dopa_explorer_3:kba_centroid", "type": "raster", "source": { "type": "raster", "tiles": [ "https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/dopa_explorer_3/wms?bbox={bbox-epsg-3857}&service=WMS&request=GetMap&layers=dopa_explorer_3:kba_centroid&format=image%2Fpng&transparent=true&version=1.1.1&height=256&width=256&srs=EPSG%3A3857" ], "tileSize": 256 }, "paint": {} }

{"name":"Country ", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"country_name"}

{"name":"%", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"kba_avg_prot_perc_tot"}

{"name":"Key Biodiversity Areas average protection", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Key Biodiversity Areas average protection", "data":"kba_avg_prot_perc_tot"}

Descending

REST

un_m49

Natural Breaks (Jenks)

Topic

Conservation

Geospatial Data - State of NBSAPs publication_2021

Anonymous — Fri, 22 Jan 2021 15:25:11 +0000

Geospatial Data - State of NBSAPs publication_2021

Anonymous Fri, 01/22/2021 - 11:25

STATUS OF DEVELOPMENT OF NATIONAL BIODIVERSITY STRATEGIES AND ACTION PLANS OR EQUIVALENT INSTRUMENTS (NBSAPS) In the ACP group of states (including South Sudan, an observer at ACP), 73 countries have submitted an NBSAP following the adoption of the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020, including the Aichi Biodiversity Targets and 9 countries had submitted an NBSAP prior to the adoption of the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020. [Status at January 2021]

ATG

BHS

BRB

BLZ

CUB

DMA

DOM

GRD

GUY

HTI

JAM

KNA

LCA

VCT

SUR

TTO

Response (Policies and Goals/Targets)

TARGET 17 on NBSAP

Technical Reference/Fact Sheet

nbsap-status

Ranking

off

Make Map Points

Off

State

environmental policy

Add Map Layers

NBSAPs Status

{ "id": "geonode:NBSAP_ACP", "type": "raster", "source": { "type": "raster", "tiles": [ "https://geonode-rris.biopama.org/geoserver/geonode/wms?bbox={bbox-epsg-3857}&service=WMS&request=GetMap&layers=geonode:NBSAP_ACP&format=image%2Fpng&transparent=true&version=1.1.1&height=256&width=256&srs=EPSG%3A3857" ], "tileSize": 256 }, "paint": {} }

https://geonode-rris.biopama.org/geoserver/ows?service=WMS&request=GetLegendGraphic&format=image/png&WIDTH=10&HEIGHT=10&LAYER=geonode:NBSAP_ACP&STYLE=NBSAP_ACP&legend_options=fontAntiAliasing:true;fontSize:12;forceLabels:on

Topic

Conservation

Marine coverage statistics by protected areas

Manager — Wed, 01 Jun 2022 14:22:37 +0000

Marine coverage statistics by protected areas

Manager Wed, 06/01/2022 - 10:22

Indicator unit: Percentage of a marine area covered by protected areas.

Area of interest: The indicator is available at the country level.

Policy question: How much are marine areas covered by protected areas at the country and ecoregion level? This is a key question for measuring progress on the coverage element of Aichi Target 11 of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD).

___

Data Uploaded by Luca Battistella using the Digital Observatory for Protected Areas Services (2022)

Response (Policies and Goals/Targets)

Target 11 on Protected Areas

14.5 By 2020, conserve at least 10 per cent of coastal and marine areas, consistent with national and international law and based on the best available scientific information

Goal 14. Protect marine ecosystems

Technical Reference/Fact Sheet

DOPA Factsheet

Source

Source:

Ranking

off

Make Map Points

Off

Global Data

Marine coverage statistics by protected areas

The indicator can be used to assess how far countries are from the Aichi Target 11 of having 10% of coastal and marine areas covered by well connected systems of protected areas. Inversely, the information highlights where on the globe additional efforts are most needed in expanding or reinforcing the coverage by protected areas.

https://rest-services.jrc.ec.europa.eu/services/d6dopa/dopa_42/get_dopa_country_all_inds?format=json

iso3

{"name":"Country ", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"country_name"}

{"name":"Marine Protection (%) ", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"country_marine_perc_country_tot"}

{"name":"Marine Protection (%) ", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Marine Protection (%) ", "data":"country_marine_perc_country_tot"}

Descending

REST

un_m49

Natural Breaks (Jenks)

diverging-4

Regional Data

Marine Protection (%)

The indicator can be used to assess how far countries are from the Aichi Target 11 of having 10% of coastal and marine areas covered by wellconnected systems of protected areas. Inversely, the information highlights where on the globe additional efforts are most needed in expanding or reinforcing the coverage by protected areas.

https://api.biopama.org/api/protection_level/function/api_region_stats/

region

Group

{"name":"Region", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"region"}

{"name":"Marine Protection (%) ", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"mar_perc_prot"}

{"name":"Marine Protection (%) ", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Marine Protection (%) ", "data":"mar_perc_prot"}

Descending

REST

Natural Breaks (Jenks)

sequential-5

National Data

Marine Protection (%)

The indicator can be used to assess how far countries are from the Aichi Target 11 of having 10% of coastal and marine areas covered by wellconnected systems of protected areas. Inversely, the information highlights where on the globe additional efforts are most needed in expanding or reinforcing the coverage by protected areas.

https://rest-services.jrc.ec.europa.eu/services/d6dopa/dopa_42/get_dopa_country_all_inds?format=json&country_code=NUM

{"name":"Country ", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"country_name"}

{"name":"Marine Protection (%) ", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"country_marine_perc_country_tot"}

{"name":"Marine Protection (%) ", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Marine Protection (%) ", "data":"country_marine_perc_country_tot"}

Descending

REST

un_m49

Natural Breaks (Jenks)

Topic

Conservation

Megafauna Conservation Index

Manager — Wed, 30 Mar 2022 13:58:33 +0000

Megafauna Conservation Index

Manager Wed, 03/30/2022 - 09:58

The Megafauna Conservation Index (MCI), developed by researcher led by Peter Lindsey of the University of Pretoria in South Africa, wants to assess the spatial, ecological and financial contributions of countries towards conservation of the world’s terrestrial megafauna. The index focused on three main components regarding megafauna ecology and conservation:

the proportion of the country occupied by each megafauna species,

the proportion of the range of these species that’s strictly protected in each country

the amount of money spent on conservation by each country – either domestically or internationally, relative to GDP.

Here the index is reported for the ACP countries.

In the paper megafauna is defined as large mammals as species weighing more than 150 kg for carnivores and 100 kg for omnivores and herbivores.

MCI index was then standardised into a 0–100 scale.

To learn more on the methodology used by research to estimate the MCI, please refer to the paper:

Lindsey, P. A., Chapron, G., Petracca, L. S., Burnham, D., Hayward, M. W., Henschel, P., … & Ripple, W. J. (2017). Relative efforts of countries to conserve world’s megafauna. Global Ecology and Conservation, 10, 243-252. doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2017.03.003

---

Data Uploaded by Simona Lippi using the BIOPAMA Services (2022)

Technical Reference/Fact Sheet

Relative efforts of countries to conserve world’s megafauna.

Ranking

off

Make Map Points

Off

State

natural areas, landscape, ecosystems

Global Data

Megafauna Conservation INdex

the proportion of the country occupied by each megafauna species,

the proportion of the range of these species that’s strictly protected in each country

the amount of money spent on conservation by each country – either domestically or internationally, relative to GDP.

Here the index is reported for the ACP countries.

In the paper megafauna is defined as large mammals as species weighing more than 150 kg for carnivores and 100 kg for omnivores and herbivores.

MCI index was then standardised into a 0–100 scale.

To learn more on the methodology used by research to estimate the MCI, please refer to the paper:

https://api.biopama.org/api/species/function/api_megafauna_conservation_index/

isoa3_id

iso3

{"name":"country", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"isoa3_id"}

{"name":"mci", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"MCI score"}

{"name":"Megafauna Conservation Index - 0-100 score", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Megafauna Conservation Index - 0-100 score", "data":"mci"}

Descending

REST

Natural Breaks (Jenks)

diverging-4

Topic

Conservation

Natural Areas Protection Levels

Manager — Wed, 01 Jun 2022 09:18:55 +0000

Natural Areas Protection Levels

Manager Wed, 06/01/2022 - 05:18

How well are different ecosystem types, as indicated by land cover, preserved and how strong are anthropogenic changes affecting their distribution in a given area? Human pressures are constantly increasing and it is important to monitor the consequences of the associated changes on the environment, in particular inside and around protected areas to ensure that natural ecosystems and their
associated species and ecosystem functions (e.g. goods and services) are preserved. By comparing land cover maps over time at the country, ecoregion and protected area level, land use changes can be identified.

Indicator unit: Natural areas and their protection statistics are expressed in km2 of the area of interest.

Area of interest: Natural areas and their protection statistics have been generated for each country.

---

Data Uploaded by Luca Battistella using the Digital Observatory for Protected Areas Services (2022)

Response (Policies and Goals/Targets)

Target 11 on Protected Areas

15.2: By 2020, promote the implementation of sustainable management of all types of forests, halt deforestation, restore degraded forests and substantially increase afforestation and reforestation globally

Goal 15. Protect terrestrial ecosystems

Technical Reference/Fact Sheet

DOPA Factsheet

Source

Source:

Ranking

off

Make Map Points

Off

Global Data

Natural Areas Protection Levels

The natural area variable is extracted from the Copernicus Global 100m Land Cover map 2019 by aggregating all land cover classes except ‘Urban/Built-Up’ and ‘Cultivated and Managed vegetation/agriculture (cropland)’, including therefore areas where land cover is not heavily disturbed by man’s activities.

https://rest-services.jrc.ec.europa.eu/services/d6dopa/dopa_42/get_dopa_country_all_inds?format=json

iso3

{"name":"Country ", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"country_name"}

{"name":"Natural Areas (km2)", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"lc_copernicus_land_natural_sqkm"}

{"name":"Natural Areas (km2)", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Natural Areas (km2)", "data":"lc_copernicus_land_natural_sqkm"}

{"name":"Natural Areas protection (km2)", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Natural Areas protection (km2)", "data":"lc_copernicus_land_natural_prot_sqkm"}

Descending

REST

Natural Breaks (Jenks)

sequential-11

National Data

Natural Areas Protection Levels

The natural area variable is extracted from the Copernicus Global 100m Land Cover map by aggregating all land cover classes except ‘Urban/Built-Up’ and ‘Cultivated and Managed vegetation/agriculture (cropland)’, including therefore areas where land cover is not heavily disturbed by man’s activities.

https://rest-services.jrc.ec.europa.eu/services/d6dopa/dopa_42/get_dopa_country_all_inds?format=json&country_code=NUM

iso3

{"name":"Country ", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"country_name"}

{"name":"Natural Areas (km2)", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"lc_copernicus_land_natural_sqkm"}

{"name":"Natural Areas (km2)", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Natural Areas (km2)", "data":"lc_copernicus_land_natural_sqkm"}

{"name":"Natural Areas protected (km2)", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Natural Areas protected (km2)", "data":"lc_copernicus_land_natural_prot_sqkm"}

Descending

REST

un_m49

Natural Breaks (Jenks)

Topic

Conservation

Protected Areas Connectivity (ProtConn)

Manager — Mon, 30 May 2022 12:44:52 +0000

Protected Areas Connectivity (ProtConn)

Manager Mon, 05/30/2022 - 08:44

How well connected are the terrestrial protected area systems at the country level? This indicator can be used to assess the degree to which the spatial arrangement of Protected Areas (PAs) is successful in ensuring connectivity of protected lands; to monitor the country progress towards Aichi Target 11 of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and design where additional efforts are most needed in expanding or reinforcing the connectivity of PA systems.

Reference: Saura, S., Bastin, L., Battistella, L., Mandrici, A., Dubois, G. 2017. Protected areas in the world’s ecoregions: how well connected are they? Ecological Indicators, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.12.047

---

Data Uploaded by Luca Battistella using the Digital Observatory for Protected Areas Services (2022)

Response (Policies and Goals/Targets)

Target 11 on Protected Areas

Technical Reference/Fact Sheet

Protected Connected (ProtConn) Land DOPA Facsheet

Source

Source:

Ranking

off

Make Map Points

Off

Global Data

Connectivity of terrestrial protected areas

The degree to which the spatial arrangement of Protected Areas (PAs) is successful in ensuring connectivity of protected lands

https://rest-services.jrc.ec.europa.eu/services/d6dopa/dopa_42/get_dopa_country_all_inds?format=json

iso3

{"name":"Country ", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"country_name"}

{"name":"protconn", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"Connectivity of terrestrial protected areas"}

{"name":"Connectivity of terrestrial protected areas", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Connectivity of terrestrial protected areas", "data":"protconn"}

Descending

REST

Natural Breaks (Jenks)

diverging-4

National Data

Connectivity of terrestrial protected areas

The map shows the Percentage of country area covered by protected connected lands. The values of Protected Connected land (ProtConn, % of ecoregion area covered by protected connected lands), calculated for a reference median species dispersal distance of 10 km, and of protected area coverage (% of ecoregion area under protection) for all terrestrial ecoregions of the world (lakes and Antarctica excluded).

The indicator considers the spatial arrangement, size and coverage of protected areas (PAs), and accounts for both the land area that can be reached within PAs and that which is reachable through the connections between different PAs. The analysis includes all designated PAs in the WDPA (polygons and buffered points) not smaller than 1 km2, except UNESCO Biosphere Reserves, and is conducted for a range of median dispersal distances (1 to 100 km) observed for most terrestrial vertebrates. The indicator is calculated through network analysis, with the Probability of Connectivity and the Equivalent Connected Area as the underlying metrics.

For more details see Saura et al. (2017).

https://rest-services.jrc.ec.europa.eu/services/d6dopa/dopa_42/get_dopa_country_all_inds?format=json&country_code=NUM

{"name":"Country ", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"country_name"}

{"name":"protconn", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"protconn"}

{"name":"Connectivity of terrestrial protected areas", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Connectivity of terrestrial protected areas", "data":"protconn"}

Descending

REST

un_m49

Natural Breaks (Jenks)

Topic

Conservation

Protection Levels of Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) by country

Manager — Mon, 30 May 2022 13:08:27 +0000

Protection Levels of Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) by country

Manager Mon, 05/30/2022 - 09:08

In which countries are the sites that most contribute to global biodiversity persistence located and how well are these sites covered by protected areas in each country? Safeguarding the Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) is vital for halting the decline in biodiversity and for ensuring the long term and sustainable use ofterrestrial and marine natural resources. The establishment of protected areas in the locations where these KBAs are found is one of the priority actions to safeguard their conservation values. The KBA-related indicators contribute to measuring progress towards Aichi Target 11 of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), and are also part of the suite of indicators adopted to assess progress towards Sustainable Development Goal 15 (life on land).

Indicator unit: Number of KBAs in each country.

Area of interest: Number of KBAs completely covered by protected areas (PAs), partially covered by PAs, and with no coverage by PAs in each country

---

Data Uploaded by Luca Battistella using the Digital Observatory for Protected Areas Services (2022)

Response (Policies and Goals/Targets)

Target 11 on Protected Areas

Goal 14. Protect marine ecosystems

Goal 15. Protect terrestrial ecosystems

Target 12 on threatened species

Technical Reference/Fact Sheet

DOPA Factsheet

Source

Source:

Ranking

off

Make Map Points

Off

State

natural areas, landscape, ecosystems

Add Map Layers

Key Biodiversity Areas Centroids

Global Data

Fully protected Key Biodiversity Areas

https://rest-services.jrc.ec.europa.eu/services/d6dopa/dopa_42/get_dopa_country_all_inds?format=json

iso3

{"name":"Country ", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"country_name"}

{"name":"Number of Key Biodiversity Areas", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"kba_n_fully_prot"}

{"name":"Number of Key Biodiversity Areas", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Number of Key Biodiversity Areas", "data":"kba_n_tot"}

{"name":"Number of Key Biodiversity Areas partially protected ", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Number of Key Biodiversity Areas partially protected ", "data":"kba_n_partially_prot"}

{"name":"Number of Key Biodiversity Areas fully protected ", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Number of Key Biodiversity Areas fully protected ", "data":"kba_n_fully_prot"}

Descending

REST

Natural Breaks (Jenks)

diverging-4

National Data

Total Number of Key Biodiversity Areas

https://rest-services.jrc.ec.europa.eu/services/d6dopa/dopa_42/get_dopa_country_all_inds?format=json&country_code=NUM

{"name":"Country ", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"country_name"}

{"name":"kba_n_tot", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"kba_n_tot"}

{"name":"Total Number of Key Biodiversity Areas", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Total Number of Key Biodiversity Areas", "data":"kba_n_tot"}

{"name":"Number of Fully protected Key Biodiversity Areas", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Number of Fully protected Key Biodiversity Areas", "data":"kba_n_fully_prot"}

{"name":"Number of Partially protected Key Biodiversity Areas", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Number of Partially protected Key Biodiversity Areas", "data":"kba_n_partially_prot"}

Descending

REST

un_m49

Natural Breaks (Jenks)

Topic

Conservation

Protection of the West African Manatee

Anonymous — Tue, 24 Aug 2021 16:14:27 +0000

Protection of the West African Manatee

Anonymous Tue, 08/24/2021 - 12:14

The Memorandum of Understanding concerning the concerning the Conservation of the Manatee and Small Cetaceans of Western Africa and Macaronesia was concluded under the auspices of the Convention on Migratory Species (CMS) and came into effect on 3 October 2008. It will remain open for signature indefinitely. It aims to achieve and maintain a favourable conservation status for manatees and small cetaceans of Western Africa and Macaronesia and their habitats and to safeguard the associated values of these species for the people of the region. Various threats, including direct and accidental catch, coastal development, pollution and habitat degradation, have caused West African marine mammal populations to decline rapidly. The West African manatee belongs to the order Sirenia and is one of three manatee species, along with the Amazonian and the American manatee. Being the most threatened of the three species, as noted by the CMS Scientific Council in 1999, it is listed in Appendix II of the Convention. Among the main threats for this species are the destruction of its natural habitats, mangroves and coastal wetlands, by pollution and overexploitation; and the hunting for meat, leather and oil.

Response (Policies and Goals/Targets)

Goal 3 - Target 8

Target 12 on threatened species

Technical Reference/Fact Sheet

Action Plan for the Conservation of the West African Manatee

Ranking

off

Make Map Points

Off

Global Data

Protection of the West African Manatee

The West African Manatee, Trichechus senegalensis, listed as ‘Vulnerable’ on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, inhabits shallow coastal waters, wetland systems and rivers from Senegal to Angola. Some of the most threats to this species include incidental capture in nets, hunting for meat, skin, bones and oil, and moreover habitat loss as a result of the damming of rivers, cutting of mangroves for firewood, coastal development, and the destruction of wetlands for agricultural development.

The dataset show the percentage geographic range of West African Manatee protected per country at July 2021

https://api.biopama.org/api/species/function/api_trichechus_sen_protection

isoa3_id

iso3

{"name":"Country", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"iso3_id"}

{"name":"Percentage of geographic range protected", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"perc_prote"}

{"name":"Percentage of geographic range protected", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Percentage of geographic range protected", "data":"perc_prote"}

Descending

REST

Natural Breaks (Jenks)

diverging-2

Topic

Conservation

Standard Material Transfer Agreements (SMTAs)

Manager — Wed, 01 Jun 2022 14:24:20 +0000

Standard Material Transfer Agreements (SMTAs)

Manager Wed, 06/01/2022 - 10:24

Indicator 15.6.1: Total reported number of Standard Material Transfer Agreements (SMTAs) transferring plant genetic resources for food and agriculture to the country (number). The Contracting Parties to the Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture have established a Multilateral System both to facilitate access to Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture and to share, in a fair and equitable way, the benefits arising from the utilization of these resources, on a complementary and mutually reinforcing basis. Article 12.4 of the Treaty provides that facilitated access under the Multilateral System shall be provided pursuant to a Standard Material Transfer Agreement, and the Governing Body of the Treaty, in its Resolution 1/2006 of 16 June 2006, adopted the Standard Material Transfer Agreement.
The Standard Material Transfer Agreement is a mandatory model for parties wishing to provide and receive material under the Multilateral System.

For this complementary sub-indicator, the unit of measurement is the number of Standard Material Transfer Agreements (SMTAs). The total number of SMTAs transferring plant genetic resources for food and agriculture to the country is a cumulative figure. It is calculated based on information generated through the Easy-SMTA platform. The data is the number of SMTA reported through the online system of Easy-SMTA for each country. SMTA is a mandatory contract that Contracting Parties of the International Treaty have agreed to use whenever plant genetic resources falling under the Multilateral System are made available through transfer. The number of SMTA issued (signed) could be higher, as all SMTAs signed may not be reported through the online system and therefore not recorded

Response (Policies and Goals/Targets)

Target 15.6: Promote fair and equitable sharing of the benefits arising from the utilization of genetic resources and promote appropriate access to such resources, as internationally agreed

Ranking

off

Make Map Points

Off

Global Data

Standard Material Transfer Agreements (SMTAs)

These data give the number of Standard Material Transfer Agreements (SMTAs) reported through the online system of the International Treaty (Easy-SMTA).

The Contracting Parties to the Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture have established a Multilateral System both to facilitate access to Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture and to share, in a fair and equitable way, the benefits arising from the utilization of these resources, on a complementary and mutually reinforcing basis. Article 12.4 of the Treaty provides that facilitated access under the Multilateral System shall be provided pursuant to a Standard Material Transfer Agreement, and the Governing Body of the Treaty, in its Resolution 1/2006 of 16 June 2006, adopted the Standard Material Transfer Agreement.
The Standard Material Transfer Agreement is a mandatory model for parties wishing to provide and receive material under the Multilateral System.

https://geonode-rris.biopama.org/geoserver/geonode/ows?service=wfs&version=1.1.0&request=getfeature&MAXFEATURES=9999&typename=geonode:smt_agreenment&PROPERTYNAME=isoa3_id,value_smt,&outputFormat=application/json

isoa3_id

iso3

{"name":"Country", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"isoa3_id"}

{"name":"Value", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"value_smt"}

{"name":"Total reported number of Standard Material Transfer Agreements (SMTAs) transferring plant genetic resources for food and agriculture ", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Total reported number of Standard Material Transfer Agreements (SMTAs) transferring plant genetic resources for food and agriculture ", "data":"value_smt"}

Descending

External Map Data

features

https://geonode-rris.biopama.org/geoserver/geonode/wms?

Natural Breaks (Jenks)

diverging-6

Topic

Conservation

Terrestrial and Marine coverage statistics by protected areas

Manager — Wed, 01 Jun 2022 14:39:34 +0000

Terrestrial and Marine coverage statistics by protected areas

Manager Wed, 06/01/2022 - 10:39

Indicator unit: Percentage of marine and terrestrial areas covered by protected areas.
Area of interest: The indicator is available at the country level and regional level

Policy question: How much are marine and terrestrial and inland water areas covered by protected areas at the country level? This is a key question for measuring progress on the coverage element of Aichi Target 11 of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD).

___

Data Uploaded by Luca Battistella using the Digital Observatory for Protected Areas Services (2022)

Response (Policies and Goals/Targets)

Target 11 on Protected Areas

Technical Reference/Fact Sheet

DOPA Factsheet

Source

Source:

Ranking

off

Make Map Points

Off

Global Data

Total Protection (%)

Marine: The indicator can be used to assess how far countries are from the Aichi Target 11 of having 10% of coastal and marine areas covered by wellconnected systems of protected areas. Inversely, the information highlights where on the globe additional efforts are most needed in expanding or reinforcing the coverage by protected areas.

Terrestrial: The indicator can be used to assess how far countries are from the Aichi Target 11 of having 17% of the land covered by well-connected systems of protected areas. Inversely, the information highlights where on the globe additional efforts are most needed in expanding or reinforcing the coverage by protected areas.

https://rest-services.jrc.ec.europa.eu/services/d6dopa/dopa_42/get_dopa_country_all_inds?format=json

iso3

{"name":"Country ", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"country_name"}

{"name":"Total Protection (%) ", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"country_prot_perc_country_tot"}

{"name":"Total Protection (%) ", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Total Protection (%) ", "data":"country_prot_perc_country_tot"}

Descending

REST

Natural Breaks (Jenks)

diverging-4

Regional Data

Terrestrial Protection (%)

https://api.biopama.org/api/protection_level/function/api_region_stats/

region

Group

{"name":"Region", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"region"}

{"name":"Terrestrial Protection (%) ", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"ter_perc_prot"}

{"name":"Terrestrial Protection (%) ", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Terrestrial Protection (%) ", "data":"ter_perc_prot"}

{"name":"Marine Protection (%) ", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Marine Protection (%) ", "data":"mar_perc_prot"}

Descending

REST

Natural Breaks (Jenks)

sequential-5

National Data

Total Protection (%)

https://rest-services.jrc.ec.europa.eu/services/d6dopa/dopa_42/get_dopa_country_all_inds?format=json&country_code=NUM

{"name":"Country ", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"country_name"}

{"name":"Total Protection (%) ", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"country_prot_perc_country_tot"}

{"name":"Total Protection (%) ", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Total Protection (%) ", "data":"country_prot_perc_country_tot"}

{"name":"Marine Protection (%) ", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Marine Protection (%) ", "data":"country_marine_prot_perc_country_marine"}

{"name":"Terrestrial Protection (%)", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Terrestrial Protection (%)", "data":"country_land_prot_perc_country_land"}

Descending

REST

un_m49

Natural Breaks (Jenks)

Topic

Conservation